b2proxy
qqg.net
okkproxy
qqgnet
bitbrowser
cliproxy

RackNerd Los Angeles DC03 VPS Review: Is This $21.99/Year US VPS Worth It? Comprehensive Analysis of 3TB Monthly Traffic @ 1Gbps, Network Routing, IP Quality, and Hardware Performance

11000人交流群欢迎你加入:https://telegram.me/gwvpsceping
jtti

RackNerd is a US-based cloud infrastructure and hosting provider founded in 2019 and headquartered in California. The company offers VPS hosting, dedicated servers, Bare Metal Cloud, private cloud solutions, and colocation services. Thanks to its highly competitive pricing, more than 20 global datacenter locations, and stable network performance, RackNerd has built a strong reputation in the VPS market, particularly among developers, website owners, and international businesses. In recent years, RackNerd has also been recognized on the Inc. 5000 list of America’s fastest-growing private companies, demonstrating its rapid growth and market recognition within the global cloud infrastructure industry.

RackNerd Official Website:
RackNerd – Introducing Infrastructure Stability


RackNerd Los Angeles DC03 VPS Review

Current promotional VPS locations available from RackNerd include Los Angeles DC03, Chicago, and Seattle.

RackNerd Promotional VPS Plans

Plan CPU RAM SSD Storage Monthly Traffic / Port Price
Starter 1 Core 1GB 20GB SSD 3TB / 1Gbps $21.99/year Link
Standard 2 Cores 2GB 35GB SSD 5TB / 1Gbps $35.99/year Link
Advanced 3 Cores 4GB 60GB SSD 7TB / 1Gbps $59.99/year Link
High Performance 6 Cores 6GB 100GB SSD 12TB / 1Gbps $89.99/year Link
Flagship 7 Cores 8GB 150GB SSD 20TB / 1Gbps $119.99/year Link

Official Test IPs

  • Los Angeles DC03: 107.174.51.158
  • Chicago: 198.23.228.15
  • Seattle: 192.3.253.2

Test Configuration

This review is based on RackNerd’s Los Angeles DC03 Starter VPS plan.

Item Specification
CPU 1 vCPU
Memory 1GB RAM
Storage 20GB SSD RAID10
Bandwidth 1Gbps
Monthly Traffic 3000GB
Virtualization KVM
IPv4 1 Dedicated IPv4
Price $21.99/year Link
Test IP 23.95.252.183

This is a typical budget-friendly US KVM VPS suitable for website hosting, lightweight proxy services, testing environments, overseas applications, and other low-resource workloads.

IP Information and Quality Analysis

Basic Information

Item Details
IP Address 23.95.252.183
ASN AS36352
ASN Owner HostPapa / ColoCrossing
Location Los Angeles, California, USA
IP Type Datacenter Native IP
Registry ARIN

According to multiple databases, this IP belongs to the HostPapa/ColoCrossing network and is physically located in Los Angeles.

IP Reputation Check

Platform Result
ping0.cc 24% Risk Score, Clean
ipip.la Fraud Score 40/100
pingip.cn 5% Risk, Very Low
AbuseIPDB Low Risk
Scamalytics 40, Moderate Risk

Overall, this is a relatively clean native datacenter IP and not part of a heavily abused high-risk IP range.

Streaming and AI Service Unlock Status

Service Status
TikTok Unlocked
Netflix US Region Available
Disney+ Blocked
YouTube Premium US Region
Amazon Prime Video US Region
ChatGPT Available
Reddit Blocked

The IP works well as a standard US-based native IP. ChatGPT and Netflix are accessible, while Disney+ is not available.

IP Quality Report:
https://Report.Check.Place/ip/2CB1U9V4U.svg

Email Ports and Blacklist Status

  • Port 25 is open by default
  • Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, and other major email services work normally
  • Only 2 blacklist listings detected out of 439 checks

For a low-cost annual VPS, the IP quality is above average.

Network Latency Test

Mainland China Latency

Carrier Average Latency
China Telecom 184ms
China Unicom 196ms
China Mobile 238ms
Overall Average 206ms

Latency by Region

Region Average Latency
East China 196ms
South China 213ms
North China 179ms
Southwest China 214ms
Northeast China 203ms
Hong Kong / Macau / Taiwan 145ms
  • China Telecom performs best, with some nodes around 160ms.
  • China Unicom remains stable with latency near 200ms.
  • China Mobile latency is noticeably higher, with some regions exceeding 250ms.
  • Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan enjoy relatively low latency.

For a traditional Cogent-based Los Angeles datacenter, these results are within expectations.

Global Latency

Region Average Latency
North America 14ms
Europe 135ms
Oceania 153ms
South America 163ms
Asia 187ms
Africa 236ms

The lowest latency within Los Angeles was just 1ms, indicating a healthy local network environment.

ping.pe Packet Loss Test

Most global nodes showed 0% packet loss during testing.

Location Average Latency Packet Loss
Los Angeles 1ms 0%
Tokyo 99ms 0%–1%
Hong Kong 148–164ms 0%–1%
Singapore 183ms 0%
London 128–142ms 0%
Frankfurt Around 150ms 0%

Mainland China nodes:

  • Shanghai Alibaba Cloud: approximately 148ms–166ms
  • Guangzhou Tencent Cloud: approximately 161ms–167ms
  • Jiangsu Telecom: approximately 160ms
  • Some China Mobile nodes exceeded 200ms

Overall network stability is acceptable, although China Mobile shows more fluctuations.

China Telecom, Unicom, and Mobile Routing Analysis

China Telecom Outbound Route

Zhejiang Telecom → Shanghai 163 Backbone → San Jose → Cogent → Los Angeles ColoCrossing

China Telecom 163 Backbone
↓
San Jose
↓
Cogent AS174
↓
Los Angeles ColoCrossing
  • Uses traditional China Telecom 163 international routing
  • Connects to Cogent AS174 in the US
  • Enters the US through San Jose before reaching Los Angeles
  • No CN2 or 9929 optimization

Latency averages around 150ms.

China Unicom Outbound Route

Hunan Unicom → AS4837 → Los Angeles → Cogent → ColoCrossing

China Unicom 4837
↓
Los Angeles
↓
Cogent AS174
↓
RackNerd Datacenter
  • Uses China Unicom AS4837 international routing
  • Direct path into Los Angeles
  • Latency ranges between 175ms and 180ms

China Mobile Outbound Route

CMI → San Jose → Cogent → Los Angeles

CMI
↓
San Jose
↓
Cogent AS174
↓
Los Angeles
  • Uses China Mobile International (CMI)
  • Connects through Cogent after entering the US
  • Higher fluctuations compared to Telecom and Unicom
  • Some nodes exceed 250ms latency

Return Routing Analysis

The return routes primarily utilize Arelion, Cogent, and Level3/Lumen networks.

Return Route Report:
https://Report.Check.Place/net/2MA4KFOPR.svg

Beijing Return Routes

Beijing Telecom

Arelion → China Telecom 163
  • Originates from Los Angeles
  • Arelion handles the international segment
  • Returns via China Telecom 163
  • Latency approximately 160ms–170ms

Beijing Unicom

Cogent → China Unicom 4837
  • Some detours observed
  • Frankfurt transit appears in the route
  • Latency fluctuations are relatively high

Beijing Mobile

Arelion → CMI
  • Returns via China Mobile International
  • Latency around 188ms
  • Reasonably stable

Shanghai Return Routes

Shanghai Telecom

Cogent → China Telecom 163
  • Latency approximately 165ms–180ms

Shanghai Unicom

Arelion → China Unicom 4837
  • Enters China through Beijing before routing south
  • Latency approximately 180ms–210ms

Shanghai Mobile

Level3 → CMI
  • Uses Lumen/Level3 internationally
  • Connects to CMI through Seattle
  • Latency around 198ms

Guangdong Return Routes

Guangdong Telecom

Cogent → China Telecom 163

Latency approximately 160ms–167ms.

Guangdong Unicom

Arelion → China Unicom 4837

Latency approximately 175ms–180ms.

Guangdong Mobile

Level3 → Frankfurt → CMI
  • Significant detour through Germany
  • Latency exceeds 270ms
  • Poor experience for Guangdong Mobile users

Hardware Performance Testing

CPU Performance

Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
Benchmark Result
Sysbench Single-Core 656.60
Geekbench 5 Single-Core 406
Geekbench 5 Multi-Core 439

This represents typical performance from an older Xeon E5 platform and is suitable for:

  • Website hosting
  • Lightweight Docker workloads
  • Small databases
  • Proxy services
  • WordPress websites

It is not suitable for CPU-intensive workloads.

Memory Performance

Metric Result
Read 11273 MB/s
Write 9167 MB/s
Latency 376ns

Memory performance is solid with no obvious signs of overselling.

  • No KSM memory deduplication
  • No balloon memory reclamation

This indicates healthy resource management on the host node.

Disk Performance

Test Speed
4K Random Read 15.7MB/s
4K Random Write 23.1MB/s
Sequential Read 780MB/s
Sequential Write 1305MB/s

This is typical SSD RAID10 performance. While not NVMe-level, it is more than adequate at this price point.

Hardware Report:
https://Report.Check.Place/hardware/39KZKZD5I.svg

Speed Test Results

Mainland China Speed Test

Location Upload Download
Suzhou Telecom 571Mbps 484Mbps
Hangzhou Telecom 260Mbps 521Mbps
Shanghai Unicom 609Mbps 434Mbps
Beijing Unicom 400Mbps 467Mbps

China Mobile tests failed, indicating average compatibility with Mobile networks.

International Speed Test

Location Download Speed
Los Angeles 866Mbps
Tokyo 429Mbps
Hong Kong 352Mbps
Singapore 287Mbps
London 438Mbps

International bandwidth performance is solid, especially within North America.

Network Report:
https://Report.Check.Place/net/3Q95C6I8O.svg

Network Summary

Advantages

  • Extremely affordable annual pricing
  • KVM virtualization
  • Excellent local Los Angeles latency
  • Usable for China Telecom and Unicom users
  • Decent IP quality
  • ChatGPT and Netflix accessible
  • Generous international bandwidth
  • No obvious signs of overselling

Disadvantages

  • No optimized routes for Chinese networks
  • Heavy reliance on Cogent within the US
  • Poor China Mobile performance
  • Noticeable detours for Guangdong Mobile users
  • Disney+ unavailable
  • Older Xeon E5 platform with limited CPU performance

Who Is This VPS Suitable For?

  • Overseas website hosting
  • WordPress blogs
  • Lightweight Docker applications
  • Linux learning and testing
  • Lightweight proxy nodes
  • ChatGPT-related projects
  • North American business applications

If you require excellent connectivity to mainland China, especially as a China Mobile user, it is recommended to consider CN2 GIA, China Telecom 9929, CMIN2, or other optimized route solutions.

Conclusion

RackNerd’s Los Angeles DC03 VPS at just $21.99 per year is essentially a budget-friendly US VPS with standard international routing.

Its key strengths are straightforward:

  • Very affordable pricing
  • Stable international network
  • Good support for China Telecom and Unicom users
  • Reasonable IP quality
  • Suitable for lightweight workloads

Although it does not use premium optimized routes, the overall value remains excellent considering the annual cost of only $21.99. For users with limited budgets who primarily target international audiences or need a lightweight hosting environment, this remains a strong entry-level US VPS option worth considering.

标签:
racknerd