BandwagonHost Basic VPS (Canada Vancouver CABC_1) Review: 1TB Monthly Traffic @ 1Gbps for $49.99/Year — How Does This North American Transit Route Perform Without CN2?

9000人交流群欢迎你加入：https://t.me/gwvpsceping

1. Package & Basic Specifications

This review covers the BandwagonHost Basic VPS plan ($49.99/year), hosted in the Vancouver, Canada datacenter (CABC_1). The configuration is as follows:

This plan supports free datacenter migration between the following locations:

US: Los Angeles, California (DC2 AO) [USCA_2]
US: Los Angeles, California (DC8 ZNET) [USCA_8]
US: Fremont, California [USCA_FMT]
US: New Jersey [USNJ]
US: New York (Coresite NY1) [USNY_6]
CA: British Columbia, Vancouver (AMD-F+NVMe) [CABC_1]
EU: Amsterdam, Netherlands DC2 (AMD) [EUNL_2]

BandwagonHost Official Website: [https://bandwagonhost.com/](https://bandwagonhost.com/)

2. Basic Performance (IO / CPU)

According to the Superbench test results, this VPS delivers notably strong local performance:

• CPU: AMD EPYC Genoa (2 Cores)
• Disk IO: Approximately 2250 MB/s (extremely high)
• Memory: Around 1GB available
• System: CentOS 7

👉 Conclusion:

Disk performance is significantly better than most VPS offerings in the same price range, making it suitable for lightweight hosting, control panels, caching, or relay/proxy workloads.

3. China Network Latency Performance

🇨🇳 Average Latency by Chinese ISPs

👉 Conclusion:

• Latency is within the normal range for North American VPS services
• Taiwan and Hong Kong/Macau perform the best
• Remote regions such as Tibet and Xinjiang may exceed 260ms

4. International Latency Performance

👉 Conclusion:

This VPS behaves more like an extension node optimized around the North American west coast backbone.

5. China Inbound Routing Analysis (Key Section)

1️⃣ China Telecom Route (AS4134 → USA → Canada)

Path:

China Telecom → Shanghai/Los Angeles → Fremont → Vancouver (IT7)

Characteristics:

• Uses the standard 163 international backbone
• Transit through Los Angeles/San Jose in the US
• Then enters Vancouver, Canada

👉 Summary:

• Not a CN2 route
• Typical “163 + US transit” architecture
• Latency ranges around 180–260ms

2️⃣ China Unicom Route (AS4837)

Path:

China Unicom → San Jose CU169 → Fremont → Vancouver

Characteristics:

• Uses the AS4837 backbone
• Enters North American backbone through San Jose
• Then routes to IT7 Canada

👉 Summary:

• Good stability overall
• Slightly higher latency (~190–240ms)
• No direct optimization

3️⃣ China Mobile Route (CMI)

Path:

CMNET → Seattle CMI → Los Angeles → Vancouver

Characteristics:

• Routes through China Mobile International (CMI) Seattle node
• Then enters the US west coast network
• Finally reaches Canada

👉 Summary:

• Best performance among the three ISPs
• Latency around 190–220ms
• Relatively clean routing path

6. Return Routing Analysis (Core Section)

Overall Return Route Structure

Common characteristics among all three ISPs:

• China Telecom: NTT / 163
• China Unicom: Arelion / 4837
• China Mobile: CMI / Vultr / 9808

📌 China Telecom Return Route

NTT → 163 → Beijing/Shanghai/Guangzhou

Characteristics:

• Standard international return route
• NTT + 163 hybrid routing
• No premium optimization

📌 China Unicom Return Route

Arelion → Sweden → 4837 → Beijing Backbone

Characteristics:

• European detour through Sweden
• Long routing path
• Still reasonably stable

📌 China Mobile Return Route

Vultr / CMI → Shanghai → Guangzhou → Beijing

Characteristics:

• Relatively the best option
• CMI Seattle ingress
• Uses CMNET backbone inside China

7. IP Quality & Streaming Unlock Capability

🌐 IP Information

• Type: IDC Datacenter IP (Non-residential)
• ASN: AS25820 IT7 Networks
• Risk Level: Extremely low (0–8%)
• Tags: Some databases incorrectly classify it as “VPN/Proxy”

📺 Streaming Unlock Status

👉 Conclusion:

This is essentially a native Canadian streaming environment, but not a TikTok-friendly IP.

8. Pros & Cons Summary

✅ Pros

• Extremely strong IO performance (2GB/s+)
• Optimized for North American west coast connectivity
• Accessible from all three Chinese ISPs
• Netflix and YouTube unlock work properly
• Affordable price ($49.99/year)

❌ Cons

• No CN2 or premium optimized routing
• Higher latency for Telecom and Unicom (200ms+)
• China Unicom return route detours through Europe
• TikTok unavailable
• IDC IP instead of residential IP

9. Recommended Use Cases

✔ Suitable for:

• Overseas website hosting (WordPress / Panels)
• North American relay nodes
• Downloads / Storage / API services
• Streaming unlock purposes (Netflix, etc.)

❌ Not suitable for:

• Low-latency gaming
• High-concurrency China-facing services
• TikTok operations or IP marketing

10. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Is this VPS using CN2 routing?

No. This datacenter uses standard international routing via 163 / 4837 / CMI combined with US transit networks.

Q2: How is the access speed from China?

Average latency is around 180–230ms, which is normal for a North American VPS.

Q3: Is it suitable for hosting international business websites?

Yes, especially for North American or global audiences. The experience for China-based visitors is average.

Q4: Why does the routing pass through the United States?

Because the Vancouver datacenter relies on upstream connectivity through US backbone hubs such as Fremont and Seattle, which is common for North American network architecture.

Q5: Is the IP likely to get blocked?

Current risk scores are extremely low (<10%), so normal usage should not encounter major issues.

Final Summary

👉 In essence, the BandwagonHost CABC_1 VPS is a “North American transit-style VPS”:

• Strong hardware performance
• Standard international routing
• Suitable for global business workloads
• Not ideal for users seeking low-latency China optimization